非精英法学院要不要搞法律交叉学科研究？

圣约翰大学法学院 Brian Z. Tamanaha 教授在 Balkinization 写了一篇“Why the Interdisciplinary Movement in Legal Academia Might be a Bad Idea (For Most Law Schools)”，引起一些美国同行的热议：

1. Brian Leiter 收集的一些评论;

2. “Is Interdisciplinary Legal Study a Luxury?” by Dan Solove;

3. “Non-Elite Interdisiciplinary Scholars” by Ethan Leib;

4. “Tamanaha on Interdisciplinary Scholarship” by Belle Lettre;

5. “Interdisciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, and the Future of the Legal Academy” by Lawrence B. Solum;

6. “Law schools, scholarship, and lawyer licensing” by Larry Ribstein;

7. “Is There an Impending Crisis in Non-Elite Law Schools?” by Brian Tamanaha;

8. “Encore – I Couldn’t Resist Saying Something About the Interdisciplinarity Debate” by Jeffrey Lipshaw;

9. “Aesop’s Bat and Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship” by Mark Graber;

10. “Interdisciplinary legal education: the overt costs” by Jim Chen;

11. “On the Impact of Blogging and Legal Scholarship” by Jim Milles.

注：以上部分链接在河蟹社会需要穿墙才能访问；请自觉使用穿墙术。